10
NUMBER 118_SpRiNg 2024
GLOBAL ISSUES | iNTERNATiONAL HigHER EDUCATiON
The Mental Health Crisis
in Higher Education:
Insights from Singapore
Dave Stanfield and Andrew Tay
M
uch has been written about mental health challenges plaguing higher education
around the world. With high rates of anxiety and depression among students, ad-
ministrators struggle to provide sufficient psychological services at a time when many
institutions are facing budget constraints. Gone are the days of a pervasive stigma in-
hibiting students from seeking professional help, though studies indicate that some
vulnerable groups are less likely to access resources. Demand for counseling at most
institutions far outweighs supply.
The causes, percentages, and diagnoses likely vary somewhat between countries,
but most administrators would put student mental health high on their list of concerns.
Likewise, you would be hard-pressed to find an institution that is not struggling to re-
spond adequately. The consequences of inadequate mental health support are dire for
students and institutions, including higher rates of academic struggle and attrition.
Singapore is a good example of a country where mental health is receiving nation-
al attention, particularly in the higher education sector. A 2022 study using data at the
height of COVID-19 restrictions revealed that three out of four students at Singapore’s
flagship institution, the National University of Singapore (NUS), were at risk of depres-
sion, and over 83 percent cited high levels of stress. Recognizing that hiring additional
mental health professionals is both cost prohibitive and only part of the solution, insti-
tutions in Singapore are implementing holistic approaches to addressing mental health.
Engaging Multiple Stakeholders
Sharing the responsibility for mental health support across an institution can reduce the
burden on a university counseling center. Yale-NUS College, a residential liberal arts in-
stitution jointly established by Yale University and the National University of Singapore,
utilizes trained student affairs staff and academic advisors to triage and manage low-
er-level mental health issues including mild forms of academic stress and social anxiety.
Staff complete in-house training organized by counseling colleagues and some extend
their education through external programs such as Mental Health First Aid.
In 2021, as an increasing number of teaching faculty encountered mental health strug-
gles among their students, Yale-NUS introduced “gatekeeper training” that covered how
to recognize signs of emotional distress, taught empathic and active listening skills, and
explained the various resources available to students. Faculty and teaching assistants
are often the first to recognize student mental health issues, since they engage with stu-
dents regularly in the classroom, at advising appointments, and during office hours. Ad-
ministrators should ensure faculty have access to and utilize an internal referral system
that alerts the appropriate staff when professional follow-up is necessary.
NUS understood the importance of involving multiple stakeholders when they cre-
ated the WellNUS© Mental Health Framework in 2021 to systematically map out the dif-
ferent aspects of well-being and identify the relevant initiatives and key stakeholders
to provide support. The aim of the framework is to have a more holistic, structured, and
sustainable approach towards student and staff well-being.
Proactive and Preventative
In 2021, Yale-NUS introduced a for-credit “Resilience and Success in College” elective
course for first-year students in order to equip them with strategies to respond to the
inevitable challenges and adversity that they will face during college. Example topics
Abstract
After the COVID-19 pandemic,
tertiary students globally have
continued to struggle with their
mental health at alarming rates.
Institutions struggle to respond
adequately as the demand for
professional counseling servic-
es continues to increase. Singa-
pore’s higher education sector
offers a number of insights, in-
cluding innovative preventative
approaches, an openness to pi-
loting promising new technology,
and the involvement of multiple
institutional stakeholders.
In 2021, as an increasing number
of teaching faculty encountered
mental health struggles among
their students, Yale-NUS intro-
duced “gatekeeper training” that
covered how to recognize signs
of emotional distress, taught
empathic and active listening
skills, and explained the various
resources available to students.
11
NUMBER 118_SpRiNg 2024
iNTERNATiONAL HigHER EDUCATiON | GLOBAL ISSUES
include finding purpose, utilizing strengths, practicing vulnerability, and developing pos-
itive interpersonal relationships. The course was later adapted for graduating seniors
to help support them through the often stressful phase of transitioning out of college.
The six-week course was a collaborative effort between the student affairs division
and psychology faculty with seminar-style classroom discussions and assignments that
emphasized personal reflection and application. Students who completed the six-week
course reported that they were better equipped to navigate future issues and under-
stand what support resources are available to them.
Organizational Structure
In the United Kingdom, institutions are encouraged to focus on employee well-being
through the University Mental Health Charter and the Education Staff Wellbeing Charter.
The premise is that staff and student well-being are inextricably linked and supportive
of the other. As such, a whole-university approach was called upon to better address
mental health risks. Naturally, this requires a review of the organizational structure that
cares for both student and staff populations. NUS has taken a similar path by devoting
significant resources to staff well-being, including a dedicated in-house counseling team
for university employees. Additionally, students and staff are recruited and trained to
serve as “peer supporters” to provide basic emotional support and coping techniques
to fellow students and colleagues in need.
NUS and another large Singaporean university, Nanyang Technology University, cre-
ated well-being offices reporting directly to the university’s president and provost re-
spectively, signalling a high-level commitment to address mental health risks. Both
staff and student populations receive mental health support and experience the stra-
tegic program campaigns in a coordinated fashion from central wellness offices. This
approach is different from the organizational structure in the United Kingdom and the
United States, where mental health support is offered separately by human resources
(often through an external insurance company) for staff and by the student affairs de-
partments for students.
At NUS, the consolidation of staff and student mental well-being strategies and ap-
proaches has helped to drive consistent mental health campaign messages and resource
awareness across the entire university community. In terms of impact, the NUS #AreuOK
campaigns in 2021 and 2022 have reduced help-seeking stigma, increased awareness of
mental health resources, and increased mental health service utilization among staff
and students.
Innovations in Mental Health Services
Since the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an increased demand for mental health ser-
vices, overwhelming the existing counseling capacity in many universities, institutions
should carefully consider promising new technology. For instance, AI-enabled chatbots
and other types of online applications have gained traction in recent years, with thou-
sands of mental health-related self-help apps in the marketplace. Evidence of effective-
ness is nascent, though some promising studies have been published examining specific
technology platforms. As innovative solutions are deployed, they should be viewed as
a complement to existing well-established mental health solutions.
Other technology-based approaches are in the early phases. For example, digital phe-
notyping refers to passively tracking and actively requesting data through smart devices
to assess and predict mental health risk. For example, students could opt-in to receive
wellness-related questions via text messages providing mental health professionals
with timely information predicting when students are at risk. An institution can then
respond with appropriate interventions to prevent further mental health deterioration.
Taking this concept further, universities may be able to quantify student well-being
based on measurements through digital devices such as sleep quantity or digital foot-
prints (e.g., how orderly one navigates the learning management system). In turn, this
would allow administrators to predict students’ mental health trajectories. This tech-
nology is still in its infancy but shows promise.
One obvious challenge is the invasive nature of personal data collection required for
such approaches and all the related privacy concerns. Nevertheless, in forward-thinking
Dave Stanfield is vice president
for student affairs and dean
of students at Sarah Lawrence
College, New York, United
States, and former (2019–2023)
vice president and dean of
students at Yale-NUS College
in Singapore. E-mail: dstan-
field@sarahlawrence.edu.
Andrew Tay is director of health
and well-being at the National
University of Singapore.
E-mail: aet@nus.edu.sg.
12
NUMBER 118_SpRiNg 2024
LOANS AND FINANCING: GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES | iNTERNATiONAL HigHER EDUCATiON
Singapore, innovations like this are being evaluated as possible additional components
of a holistic approach to mental health support at NUS and other local universities.
As the global mental health crisis in higher education persists, university counseling
services will continue to face an insatiable demand. Singapore’s holistic and proactive
approach of creating varied pathways to wellness and viewing mental health support as
a collective responsibility across an entire institution provides a promising framework
that can be applied elsewhere.