CRISIL Ratings criteria for rating short-term debt

CRISIL Ratings criteria

for rating short-term

debt

November 2022

Criteria contacts

Somasekhar Vemuri

Senior Director and Head

Rating Criteria, Regulatory Affairs and Operations

Email: somasek[email protected]m

Ramesh Karunakaran

Director – Rating Criteria and

Product Development

Email: ramesh.karun[email protected]m

Chaitali Nehulkar

Associate Director – Rating Criteria and Product

Development

Email: chaitali.nehulkar@crisil.com

Vishal Krishna

Rating Analyst – Rating Criteria and Product

Development

Email: vishal.krishna@crisil.com

In case of any feedback or queries, you may write to us at criteria.feedb[email protected]

Executive summary

CRISIL Ratings assigns ratings to instruments with an original contracted maturity of up to one year, such as

commercial papers (CPs), on a short-term scale. Such short-term instruments are generally rolled over or

refinanced on maturity. The ability to refinance the short-term debt (STD) depends on the long-term credit

risk profile of the issuer. Hence, the short-term rating is derived from the long-term rating of the issuer. CRISIL

Ratings uses a mapping framework for capturing the linkage between long-term and short-term ratings.

Liquidity backup, wherever applicable, may be required to address the refinancing risk associated with

confidence-sensitive instruments such CPs and short-term non-convertible debentures (NCDs).

Scope

This article

covers CRISIL Ratings’ criteria for arriving at short-term ratings of issuers. It covers the mapping

framework for deriving short-term ratings from long-term ratings and analysis of the liquidity of issuers

undertaken in conjunction with the mapping framework. It also details the liquidity backup requirements for

confidence-sensitive short-term instruments.

Methodology

STD, including CP, is different from long-term debt; while the latter is expected to be repaid out of the internal

cash accrual of the business, STD is usually rolled over.

The steps followed for arriving at the short-term rating are:

Step 1: Assess the underlying credit quality of the issuer, as reflected in its long-term rating

Step 2: Assess liquidity and analyse the monthly bank limit utilisation of the issuer

Step 3: Arrive at a short-term rating using a mapping framework

Step 4: Evaluate the liquidity backup

Step 5: Evaluate credit enhancement options, if applicable

Step 1: Assess the underlying credit quality of the issuer

CRISIL Ratings’ rating on a CP or STD is primarily dependent on its opinion of the issuer's fundamental credit

quality. The analytical approach adopted for assigning such a rating is very similar to that for a long-term

rating as there is a strong linkage between the two. While the tenure of a CP is 7-365 days, the short-term

rating's time horizon extends well beyond this period because even such ratings are expected to endure over

time rather than change frequently. Moreover, if the maturity of a CP or STD issue cannot be met through

subsequent CP or STD issues (rollover) for any reason, the issuer has to rely on fresh borrowings. In such

a case, ability to refinance will largely depend on the fundamental credit quality, as reflected in its long-term

rating.

Step 2: Assess liquidity

Once the long-term rating is assessed, CRISIL Ratings’ rating methodology takes into account the issuer's

current liquidity. For non-financial sector entities (non-FSEs), this entails a detailed analysis of the adequacy

of internal sources of funds for covering short-term uses, including working capital requirement. This includes

an assessment of the average monthly bank limit utilisation for the past 12 months, as well as of the variations

The previous version of this article, which was published in November 2019, can be accessed here -

https://www.crisil.com/content/dam/crisil/criteria_methodology/criteria-research/archive/Criteria-for-rating-short-term-debt-nov2019.pdf

Wherever applicable

in the working capital cycle of the issuer. Where applicable, assessment of the variations in the drawing

power during the past 12 months as a proportion of the sanctioned bank limits serves as additional input for

the analysis.

For FSEs, liquidity assessment focuses on the cumulative asset-liability mismatches over various maturity

buckets, and the adequacy of liquid assets to cover maturing liabilities. Among FSEs, banks and primary

dealers (PDs) enjoy more liquidity than non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) and housing finance

companies (HFCs) due to their access to the liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) of the Reserve Bank of India

(RBI) and call money markets.

Step 3: Mapping framework

While the short-term ratings are linked to the long-term ratings, the assessment made in Step 2 provides

some flexibility in determining the exact mapping of a given long-term rating into the short-term scale. The

long-term rating scale has more levels and hence there may not be a one-to–one mapping between the two

scales (see Table 1).

The mapping adopted for financial sector companies may be different from that for manufacturing companies,

primarily on account of better liquidity and easier access to funds by the former.

Table 1: Mapping between short-term and long-term ratings (ratings within brackets only in

exceptional cases)

LT rating

Corporates

Other Fin sector

entities

(other than banks and

PDs)

PDs

Banks

AAA

A1+

AA+

A1+

AA-

A1+

A+

(A1+) A1

A1+ (A1)

A1+

A1 (A2+)

(A1+) A1 (A2+)

A1+ (A1)

A1+

A-

(A1) A2+

A1 (A2+)

A1+ (A1)

BBB+

(A2+) A2

A2+, A2

(A1) A2+

A1 (A2+, A2)

BBB

(A2) A3+ (A3)

(A2+) A2

(A1) A2+, A2

BBB-

(A2, A3+) A3

(A2) A3+, A3

A3+, A3

BB+

A4+

BB-

A4+ (A4)

A4+(A4)

A4 + (A4)

B, C categories

CRISIL Ratings may deviate from its mapping framework when it has a particular reason to ascribe a stronger

(or weaker) short-term credit quality and may assign a higher (or lower) short-term rating. The ratings within

brackets in Table 1 indicate the typical deviations that may be taken. The deviations will be based on the

analysis of liquidity, wherein CRISIL Ratings evaluates the extent of short-term sources of funds vis-à-vis

short-term funding requirement.

In some instances, CRISIL Ratings may put a ceiling on the allowable quantum of short-term debt based on

the maturity profile of the assets and liabilities, liquidity, and refinancing ability.

Step 4: Evaluate the liquidity backup

Liquidity backup is typically provided to confidence-sensitive instruments, on which the issuer may default in

times of temporary financial stress. These are instruments that are susceptible to default due to loss of

confidence among investors, which may jeopardise the financing options of the issuer as well as other issuers

of the same instrument class and lead to a series of defaults. For instance, if depositors lose confidence in

a bank, they may queue up for premature withdrawal, leading to a run on the bank’s deposits.

Similarly, in the STD market, default by one issuer may cause nervousness among investors about other

issuers and may prompt them to not roll over the STD facilities. Therefore, it is essential for the issuers to

maintain liquidity backup on STD to prevent such financial contagion. The importance of liquidity backup is

reflected in the fact that a majority of CPs are being primarily carved out of working capital limits, despite RBI

allowing the issuance of CP as a distinct product. The maintenance of liquidity backup allows issuers to

weather wide-spread disruptions in the CP market or lack of investor interest in the CP issued.

Liquidity backup for non-FSEs

CRISIL Ratings may not insist on liquidity backup for non-FSE issuers rated ‘CRISIL AA-‘or above on the

long-term scale. That’s because such highly rated issuers typically have substantial liquidity and high

refinancing ability based on their market reputation. However, CRISIL Ratings may obtain liquidity backup

on a case-to-case basis if it believes that this is warranted depending on the analysis of the liquidity of the

issuer, its capital structure, cash flow stability, and the characteristics of the industry in which it operates.

While analysing liquidity, CRISIL Ratings considers the ability of the issuer to meet short-term uses of funds

such as working capital, repayment of maturing debt, and a portion of capital expenditure, without having to

resort to additional borrowing. In all cases, however, the liquidity plan articulated by the issuer is evaluated.

CRISIL Ratings insists on liquidity backup for corporates rated ‘CRISIL A+’ or below. This is assessed for

STD under two options:

• Liquidity backup to the extent of 100% of outstanding STD: CRISIL Ratings insists on 100% liquidity

backup for the value of outstanding STD until its maturity.

• Liquidity backup for STD maturing over the next few days on a rolling basis: Stipulation of 100%

liquidity backup for the entire outstanding STD of highly rated entities may not be necessary in all cases.

That’s because many such entities have strong liquidity as they consistently maintain sufficient liquid

assets to meet short-term requirements. Hence, CRISIL Ratings may stipulate a rolling liquidity backup

for total STD (rated and unrated) maturing, say in the next “N” days. The stipulation of the number of

days is based on evaluation of the specific liquidity plan and other factors such as gearing, current ratio,

debt repayment in the near to medium term, availability of alternative options to meet STD redemptions,

and propensity of the issuer to rely on STD.

The various forms in which a corporate can provide liquidity backup are:

• Drawing power available against unutilised bank lines

• Investments in liquid MFs

• Cash/unpledged fixed deposits in a bank, of a similar or higher short-term rating in comparison with the

issuer

CRISIL Ratings also assesses the quality of the liquidity backup facility while assigning the short-term rating.

For issues that are carved out of the existing working capital bank limit, the limit would function as a liquidity

backup. For other forms of liquidity backup facilities, CRISIL Ratings looks at the nature and commitment of

the facility, its tenure, the strength of the relationship between the issuer and facility provider, and the

covenants/restrictions affecting the issuer's ability to access the facility. CRISIL Ratings does not insist on

a liquidity backup for companies that have availed of only bank facilities.

Liquidity backup for FSEs

FSEs typically have better liquidity than those engaged in manufacturing, trading, and infrastructure. Hence,

CRISIL Ratings may not insist on pre-arranged liquidity backup facilities for all classes of FSEs. CRISIL

Ratings’ analysis of the liquidity of an FSE involves understanding the extent of mismatches in its asset-

liability maturity (ALM) profile. Also considered is the liquidity plan presented by the issuer with specific

emphasis on its policies regarding maintaining liquid assets, staggering of the debt maturities so as to avoid

bunching up of repayments, and ease of access to systemic liquidity.

• Banks and PDs: Access to systemic liquidity under the LAF of RBI and access to unsecured borrowing

in the call money markets enable banks and PDs to comfortably manage liquidity. Hence, CRISIL Ratings

may stipulate liquidity backup requirements for such companies only in exceptional circumstances. Lack

of access to refinance from the regulator and a low long-term rating would typically necessitate a financial

sector issuer to provide liquidity backup for availing rating for its confidence-sensitive STD instruments

from CRISIL Ratings.

• Other FSEs (NBFCs, HFCs, FIs): For such entities, CRISIL Ratings may not insist on liquidity backup if

the issuer is rated ‘CRISIL AA-‘or above on the long-term scale. That’s because such highly rated issuers

typically have a prudent ALM profile and have high refinancing ability. However, CRISIL Ratings may

obtain liquidity backup on a case-to-case basis if it believes that liquidity backup is warranted based on

the analysis of the asset quality of the issuer, its ALM profile, and the presence of liquid assets to cover

asset-liability mismatches. In all cases, however, the liquidity plan articulated by the issuer is evaluated.

CRISIL Ratings insists on liquidity backup for NBFCs, HFCs, and FIs rated ‘CRISIL A+’ or below. The liquidity

backup may be a combination of the following:

• Sanctioned and unutilised bank lines

• Sanctioned and unutilised refinance limits from financial institutions such as RBI, National Bank for

Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD), National Housing Bank (NHB), Small Industries

Development Bank of India (SIDBI), and Export-Import Bank of India (EXIM Bank).

• Investments in liquid MFs or money market instruments

• Investments in listed equity shares subject to suitable hair cuts

• Finance limits provided by parent/group company (rated in at least the ‘AA’ category)

• Unpledged fixed deposits

• Loan against shares facility from a ‘AAA’ rated NBFC, provided it is accompanied by a board resolution

and other relevant authorisations required

Although liquidity backup facilities are a pre-requisite for rating a CP, CRISIL Ratings does not enhance CP

ratings based on the backup. That’s because most liquidity backup facilities are technically revocable by the

facility provider if the credit quality of the issuer deteriorates during the time when the rated instrument is

outstanding. In its purest sense, the liquidity facility's purpose is to cover temporary shortfalls in the issuer’s

cash flows. This means that even the strongest form of backup does not enhance the underlying credit and

does not lead to a higher rating than indicated by the issuer’s own creditworthiness. Thus, liquidity backup

facilities provide support only in times of market disruption and not when the fundamental credit quality of

the CP or STD issuer deteriorates. CRISIL Ratings enhances short-term ratings only based on unconditional

and irrevocable credit-support facilities, which, if available, are evaluated in the next step of the rating

process.

Step 5: Evaluate credit enhancement options

Commercial banks may provide back-stop facilities for credit enhancement, such as a standby credit facility.

These are distinct from liquidity facilities and work like guarantees. Corporate entities may also provide

guarantees for a CP issue. A standby credit facility or a guarantee is unconditional and irrevocable and is

available under all circumstances to meet obligations on the issue if the primary obligor (the issuer) fails to

do so. In such cases, the CP/STD rating is generally equated to that of the facility provider irrespective of the

issuer's standalone rating.

For more details, please refer to “CRISIL Ratings’ criteria for rating guaranteed instruments”, available on

www.crisil.com.

Box 1: Ratings for CP issues of IPO Financiers

CRISIL Ratings assigns ratings to commercial paper issues which are used for raising resources for

financing investors in initial public offerings (IPO) and follow-on public offers. It is to be noted that the rated

quantum of commercial paper for IPO financing could be higher than the steady-state business-as-usual

requirement given the oversubscription in many of the IPOs. However, appropriate structure is present for

the entire IPO process which ensures that the overall process of fund flow is well defined; the bank account

of client for application money and the DEMAT account where shares are allotted, are controlled by the

lender. Also, an accurate estimation of demand for the IPO makes the debt structure largely self-

liquidating.

It is also of a significantly shorter tenor, being linked to the duration of the IPO process. The rating on

these instruments will typically be at the same level as that of the regular commercial paper issuance of

the issuer. In assigning these ratings, CRISIL Ratings factors in the significantly low degree of risks of this

product due to the largely self-liquidating structure of IPO financing wherein the amount refunded post

allocation of securities covers the quantum funded by the lender. This is ensured through the margin policy

of the lender; the margin collected from the client is a function of the expected oversubscription level.

Given the operational intensity of IPO financing, in assigning these ratings, CRISIL Ratings also factors in

the risk management systems and processes of the lender, as well as the experience of the lender in IPO

financing.

Conclusion

CRISIL Ratings assigns short-term ratings to instruments with original contracted maturity of less than one

year, such as CPs and STD. These short-term ratings are derived from the long-term ratings of issuers as

per a mapping framework that captures the linkages between long-term and short-term ratings. The mapping

is different for FSEs and non-FSEs to account for inherent differences in their liquidity. CRISIL Ratings also

analyses in detail the liquidity of the issuer to arrive at the exact mapping level as per the mapping framework.

CRISIL Ratings typically insists on liquidity backup for CPs and STD, except for certain FSEs and highly

rated issuers with strong liquidity.

About CRISIL Limited

CRISIL is a leading, agile and innovative global analytics company driven by its mission of making markets function better.

It is India’s foremost provider of ratings, data, research, analytics and solutions, with a strong track record of growth, culture of

innovation and global footprint.

It has delivered independent opinions, actionable insights, and efficient solutions to over 100,000 customers.

It is majority owned by S&P Global Inc, a leading provider of transparent and independent ratings, benchmarks, analytics and data

to the capital and commodity markets worldwide.

About CRISIL Ratings

CRISIL Ratings is part of CRISIL Limited (“CRISIL”). We pioneered the concept of credit rating in India in 1987. CRISIL is registered

in India as a credit rating agency with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). With a tradition of independence,

analytical rigour and innovation, CRISIL sets the standards in the credit rating business. We rate the entire range of debt

instruments, such as, bank loans, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, non-convertible / convertible / partially convertible

bonds and debentures, perpetual bonds, bank hybrid capital instruments, asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, partial

guarantees and other structured debt instruments. We have rated over 24,500 large and mid-scale corporates and financial

institutions. CRISIL has also instituted several innovations in India in the rating business, including rating municipal bonds, partially

guaranteed instruments and microfinance institutions. We also pioneered a globally unique rating service for Micro, Small and

Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) and significantly extended the accessibility to rating services to a wider market. Over 1,10,000

MSMEs have been rated by us.

CRISIL Privacy

CRISIL respects your privacy. We may use your contact information, such as your name, address, and email id to fulfil your

request and service your account and to provide you with additional information from CRISIL. For further information on CRISIL’s

CRISIL Limited: CRISIL House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Business Park, Powai, Mumbai – 400076. India Phone:

+ 91 22 3342 3000 | Fax: + 91 22 3342 3001 | www.crisil.com