5
factors: materials specifications duplicated (or even tripled); specifications poorly done; theft of
materials; lack of procedures for order fulfillment, where warehouse keeper often provided the
material but forgot to write down or incorrectly wrote down the quantity; lack of procedures for
receiving materials, causing discrepancies between the amount actually received and the amount
recorded in the system and lack of procedures to scrap overdue or damaged materials.
Still referring to inventory control, despite trying to follow the First In, First Out (FIFO)
method to supply the materials, during the storage the method was not always observed. In
addition, the previously installed system did not allow the control of lots of materials as well as
their validity. Consequently, numerous materials were expiring and were being held in stock,
even without being able to be used.
The purchase orders were triggered based on intuition and experience of the buyers,
disregarding often even the inventory level registered in the system. Although the system
registered the orders filled, the historical demand records were unreliable and, as the whole
purchase process was done on paper, there was no record on the lead time of the suppliers or lead
time between placing the order and receiving materials. Thereby, all material purchased has not
taken demand and lead time variation into consideration; thus it made the situations of too high
or too low inventory arise, causing sometimes materials shortfalls to the University and
sometimes loss of material due to obsolescence.
Due to the stiffness of the procurement system in the public sphere and the long lead
times, frequently the situations of lack of materials can not be easily contained. This often caused
the excess of material that was not used, and lack of materials required and, consequently, an
inventory imbalance.
The lack of procedures and inventory control, in general, also brought as a consequence
the problem of lack of space in the warehouse and improper storage. Thus, the materials were
stored without proper care, such as: food materials stocked with cleaning supplies; food materials
stored in contact with the ground; boxes stored without respecting the stacking limits, causing,
damage to products and difficulties to find a material when needed and, sometimes, generating
unnecessary purchase orders, feeding, thus, the cycle of inventory imbalance.
Regarding the organizational structure, it could be observed that one of the most evident
characteristic was the great departmentalization of work. This condition has historical source and
is deeply embedded in the sector. This excess departmentalization led to problems such as:
unfamiliarity with the process as a whole by employees, hindering the arising of proposals for
improvements and causing the accomplishment of the same activity by more than one
department; inefficient attitudes as "blaming the other" or "do it anyway just to meet the deadline
and then redo" and, consequently, increasing the slowness of the system. Moreover, as the
process should strongly follow the laws, employees often use them as an excuse, i.e., they often
say that they can not do because something they are not authorized by law (when in fact, they
are) or continuously make the activities in a way less efficient, simply because "it has always
been done in that way", without questioning of the related legislation, modus operandi or other
aspects involved.
Regarding the leadership, centralizing attitudes, due to lack of preparation by managers
or due to fear of losing their position inhibit proactive attitudes of employees and autonomy of
the same and also cause demotivation, increasing inefficiency of the system. Moreover, the
existence of promotions or accomplishment of activities based, sometimes, on friendship and
closeness also caused demotivate on employees.