Nebraska Restorative Justice Facilitator Standards of Practice; 08/26/2020 1
Nebraska Restorative Justice Facilitator Standards of Practice
The Nebraska Restorative Justice Facilitator Standards of Practice were adopted by the Nebraska
Office of Dispute Resolution in August 2020. These Standards are adopted under the Office’s
charge to “adopt policies and procedures” to determine “best practices” in restorative justice.
Neb. Rev. Code 25-2912.02. These standards are adapted from existing codes of conduct and
standards for mediators, including the AAA/ABA/ACR Model Standards of Conduct for
Mediators (2005). The purpose of these Nebraska Restorative Justice Facilitator Standards is
fourfold: 1) to inform the practice of individual facilitators; 2) to guide the training of new
facilitators; 3) to provide confidence to the participants in restorative processes; and 4) to
promote public confidence in these practices.
Under Nebraska law, restorative justice practices include, but are not limited to “victim youth
conferences, victim-offender mediation, family group conferences, circles, peer-to-peer
mediation, truancy mediation, victim or community panels, and community conferences.
Restorative justice programs may involve restorative projects or classes and facilitated meetings
attended voluntarily by the victim, the victim's representatives, or a victim surrogate and the
victim's supporters, as well as the youth or adult individual who caused harm and that
individual's supporters, whether voluntarily or following a referral for assessment by court order.
These meetings may also include community members, when appropriate.” Neb. Rev. Code 25-
2912.01. These processes intend to: 1) hold an individual who caused the harm accountable, 2)
provide voice for the victim, 3) provide an opportunity to repair the harm, and 4) enable the
parties to agree on the consequences to repair the harm. Id.
The Nebraska Legislature recognized many of the benefits of restorative practices. Neb. Rev.
Code 25-2902. In particular, the Legislature found that “[e]mploying restorative justice can
provide an avenue for repair, healing, accountability, and community safety to address the harm
experienced by victims as a result of an offense committed by youth or adult individuals,” and
“[t]here is a compelling need in a complex society for dispute resolution and restorative justice
whereby people can participate in creating comprehensive, lasting, and realistic resolutions to
conflicts and offenses.” Neb. Rev. Code 25-2902(4) & (9).
In these Standards, the use of the term “shall” indicates that the facilitator must follow the
practice described. The use of the term “should” indicates that the practice described in the
standard is highly desirable, but not strictly required.
The use of the term “facilitator” is understood to apply to co-facilitator models.
The Office of Dispute Resolution recognizes that programs falling under the category of
“restorative justice” use different terms and labels for those participating in the various
processes. To the extent possible, these standards refer collectively to all of those attending as
“participants.”
The term “harmed party” is intended to include those who might also be classified as a “victim,”
“survivor,” or similar status within a case or program.