www.crs.gov | 7-5700
October 5, 2018
Agricultural Provisions of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement
On September 30, 2018, the Trump Administration
announced an agreement with Canada and Mexico to
replace the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) with the United States-Mexico-Canada
Agreement (USMCA). USMCA, if finalized, will allow
food and agriculture products to “trade more fairly,”
according to the U.S. Trade Representative, and will
expand exports of U.S. agricultural goods. While USMCA
includes provisions that address many sectors, this report
summarizes the agriculture and sanitary and phytosanitary
(SPS) provisions of the agreement. The President is
expected to sign USMCA on November 30, 2018, before
sending the agreement and implementing legislation to
Congress for approval. It must also be approved by the
governments of Canada and Mexico.
Canada and Mexico were the first- and third-leading export
markets for U.S. agriculture and food products by value in
2017, worth $20.6 billion and $18.6 billion, respectively.
Since NAFTA was signed in 1993which eliminated most
tariffs on agricultural goods sold among the three
countriesthe value of U.S. agricultural trade with its
NAFTA partners has increased. Agricultural exports rose
from $8.7 billion in 1992 to $39 billion in 2017, while
imports rose from $6.5 billion to $47 billion over the same
time period. There has been a trade deficit for agricultural
products since 2014, including an $8 billion trade deficit in
2017 that is the largest deficit since NAFTA was signed.
Figure 1. U.S.-NAFTA Agricultural Trade, 1992-2017
Source: CRS from USDA, Global Agricultural Trading System. Data
are not adjusted for inflation.
Canadian Dairy Policy Changes
Under USMCA, Canada has agreed to reduce certain
barriers for U.S. dairy exports, a key demand of U.S. dairy
groups. Canada restricts U.S. dairy exports through tariff-
rate quotas (TRQs) with high over-quota tariffs. Currently,
most of the in-quota tariffs for U.S. dairy exports to Canada
are set at zero, but over-quota tariffs can be as high as
313.5%. Under USMCA, Canada would maintain its supply
management system, but USMCA would expand TRQs that
increase each year for U.S. exports of milk, cheese, cream,
skim milk powder, condensed milk, yogurt, and several
other dairy categories. In addition, USMCA includes
broader provisions on transparency for the implementation
of TRQs, such as requirements for advanced notice of
changes to the quotas and making publicly available details
on quota utilization rates.
Canada has further agreed to changes in its milk pricing
system that has set low prices for Canadian skim milk
solids, undercutting U.S. exports. Six months after USMCA
goes into effect, Canada will eliminate its Class 7 milk
price (which includes skim milk solids, Class 6 in Ontario)
and will set its price for skim milk solids based on a
formula that takes into account the U.S. nonfat dry milk
price, among other factors. Both the United States and
Canada will need to notify each other in the future if either
introduces or changes a milk class price. Canada has further
agreed to cap its skim milk powder and milk protein
concentrate exports. USMCA also includes a requirement
that the United States and Canada meet five years after the
implementation of the agreementand every two years
after thatto determine whether to modify the dairy
provisions of the agreement.
U.S. Poultry Access to Canada
USMCA increases the TRQs for U.S. poultry and egg
exports to Canada. Much like the rules governing its dairy
sector, Canada has a supply management system for
chicken, egg, and turkey production and has allowed only a
small amount of those products to be imported duty free.
Under the agreement, the duty-free quotas for chicken starts
at 47,000 tons, expands to 57,000 tons in year six, and then
continues at a growth rate of 1% per year for the 10 years
after that. Eggs would have a new TRQ of 10 million dozen
annually, while the annual TRQ for turkey and broiler
hatching eggs and chicks would be set by formulas based
on Canadian production.
Canadian Grain Policy Changes
Under USMCA, Canada will revise its grain grading
policies to treat U.S. wheat in a way that is “no less
favorable than that it accords to like wheat of national
origin.” Canadian inspection certificates for wheat currently
do not allow for a grade, so U.S. exports cannot receive
premium prices that would come with a higher grade.
USMCA provides that neither the United States nor Canada
are allowed to have country of origin on wheat quality
certificates for wheat from either country.
Agricultural Provisions of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement
www.crs.gov | 7-5700
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Provisions
SPS measures are the laws, rules, standards, and procedures
that governments employ to protect humans, animals, and
plants from diseases, pests, toxins, and other contaminants.
USMCA’s SPS chapter calls for greater transparency in
SPS rules and regulatory alignment among the three
countries. Under the agreement, countries must base their
SPS rules on “relevant scientific principles” and eliminate
those rules that no longer have a scientific basis. While
USMCA commits the United States, Mexico, and Canada to
seek alignment and equivalence in their SPS regulations, it
also requires them to notify and give opportunity to
comment on any additions or changes to SPS rules.
USMCA further lays out requirements for notifying
exporting countries when an issue arises with a shipment
and the exchange of information on SPS issues, and it
maintains a trilateral Committee on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures to address issues as they arise.
Biotechnology Provisions
The agriculture chapter of USMCA lays out protections and
coordination on agricultural biotechnology, an issue that is
not addressed in NAFTA. USMCA requires the United
States, Mexico, and Canada to make publicly available the
details on the approval process for crops produced with
biotechnology, encourage producers to submit concurrent
applications for approval, and ensure that decisions on
those applications are made in a timely manner. Further,
when an import into a member country is found to have a
low level presence of an unapproved crop produced with
biotechnology, the importing country is to act quickly so as
to not unnecessarily delay the shipment. USMCA also
creates a Working Group for Cooperation on Agricultural
Biotechnology to help with information exchange and
advance “transparent, science and risk-based regulatory
approaches” and policies in other countries and
international organizations. The provisions of USMCA
apply to crops produced with conventional biotechnology
methods, including recombinant DNA and gene editing.
Beer, Wine, and Spirits Labeling, Sales
Canada allows its provinces to control the sale of beer,
wine, and spirits, a system that in some cases has disrupted
market access for U.S. products with barriers such as higher
prices for imported products. USMCA requires that each
country have the same treatment for distributing another
country’s spirits, wine, beer, and other alcoholic beverages
as it would its own products. It also sets rules governing
listing requirements for a product to be sold in a given
country and sets limits on cost markups of alcoholic
beverages from other countries. In a side letter to the
agreement, Canada also agreed to have British Columbia
remove its limitations on sales of nonBritish Columbian
wines in grocery stores by November 1, 2019. The
agreement further includes rules to promote transparency
and harmonization of labeling for wine and spirits
beverages among the three countries and prevent labeling
from acting as a barrier to trade.
Geographical Indications and Distinctive
Products
Geographical indications (GIs) are place names used to
identify products that come from certain regions or places.
GIs are intended to protect the quality and reputation of a
distinctive product originating in certain regions. USMCA
protects the GIs for food products that Canada and Mexico
have already agreed to in trade negotiations with the
European Union (EU) but lays out transparency and
notification requirements for any new GIs that a country
wants to recognize. The agreement also details a process for
determining whether a food name is common or should be
protected. In a side letter accompanying the agreement,
Mexico confirmed a list of 33 terms for cheese that would
remain available as common names for U.S. cheese
producers exporting to Mexico. The list includes some
terms that are protected as GIs by the EU, such as Edam,
Gouda, and Brie.
USMCA protects certain U.S., Canadian, and Mexican
spirits as distinctive products. Under the agreement,
products labeled as Bourbon Whiskey and Tennessee
Whiskey must originate in the United States. Similar
protections exist for Canadian Whiskey and Tequila and
Mezcal, which must be produced in Mexico. In a side letter
accompanying the agreement, the United States and Mexico
further agreed to protect American Rye Whiskey,
Charanda, Sotol, and Bacanora.
Protections for Proprietary Formulas
USMCA includes protections for proprietary formulas for
prepackaged foods and food additives that limit the
information countries subject to the agreement can ask for
from food companies looking to export. Countries can ask
only for information that is necessary to “achieve its
legitimate objective” and must protect the confidential
information of products from another country as it would
for domestic products.
U.S. Imports of Canadian Sugar, Dairy,
Peanuts, and Cotton
The United States has agreed to allow more access for
Canadian producers of dairy, sugar, peanuts and cotton.
Under USMCA, the United States will increase TRQs on
imports of Canadian dairy products and sugar and
sweetened products. The agreement details the phase-out
period for U.S. tariffs on cotton and peanut imports from
Canada, which will be eliminated five years after the
agreement takes effect. U.S. imports of peanut products
including shelled and unshelled peanuts and peanut
butterfrom Canada are currently subject to a 131.8%
tariff.
Agricultural Trade Issues Not Addressed
While USMCA addresses several issues that have restricted
U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico and Canada, it does not
include all of the changes sought by U.S. agricultural
groups. The agreement does not include changes to trade
remedy laws to address seasonal produce as requested by
Southeastern U.S. produce growers. It also does not address
non-tariff barriers to market access for U.S. fresh potatoes
in Canada and Mexico. Finally the agreement does not
address a resolution for retaliatory tariffs on U.S.
agricultural exports to those countries.
Jenny Hopkinson, j[email protected], 7-3137
IF10996