representation of "otherness" in Western literature has been subjected to heightened scrutiny.
Drawing on (and critiquing) Said's concepts and Michel de Certeau's articulation of strategies and
tactics of resistance in Practices of Everyday Life, we begin by focusing on exile and identity in a
nineteenth-century text such as Pierre Loti's Madame Chrysanthemum (1887).We then read twentieth-
century texts that question (or reinforce) simplistic configurations of racial and gender identities: D.
Hwang's M. Butterfly, Marguerite Duras's The Lover, Maxine H. Kingston's Tripmaster Monkey, Joy
Kogawa's Obasan, David Mura's Turning Japanese, Hanif Kureishi's Buddha of Suburbia, Linda Le's
short stories, Leila Sebbar's Sherazade, and Teresa Cha's Dictee. These novels and autobiographies by
contemporary "immigrant" writers re-frame Orientalist discourses and provide us with an original
perspective on the globalization of culture at the end of the twentieth century. The writers are from
Canada (Kogawa), the US (Kingston, Mura, Cha), England (Kureishi), and France (Sebbar, Le). We
shall also discuss movies such as Scent of Green Papaya, My Beautiful Launderette, Sammy and
Rosie Get Laid, and Map of the Human Heart. These verbal and visual texts allow us to examine
critically the concept of globalization, and to ask whether local forms of identity and cultural
expressions (i.e. Japanese-American, Arab-French, Franco-Vietnamese, and Anglo-Indian) provide a
productive counterpoint to the homogenizing tics of Western colonial discourses. We shall also strive
to understand points of commonality in the experiences of displaced peoples since the beginning of
the colonial era.
Teaching Methods: This is a seminar with short lectures, class discussions, and oral presentations by
students. Evaluation Method(s): Regular attendance and class participation, an oral presentation and
short written essay plus a final research paper
CLS C02 [AREA 1]
Language in the Text: On Vision & Language
Kersten Behnke
TTh 10:30-12 Spring Quarter
Course Description: This course will investigate the relationship of vision and language to
knowledge and subjectivity. From Plato and Aristotle to modern thinkers, knowledge has been
conceived as analogous to visual perception. These classical optical theories of knowledge are based
on the idea of a disembodied, non-participatory spectator. Rather than being immediate, seeing,
however, has been found to involve other senses in its functioning. Vision consequently reveals its
constructedness. As embodied or corporeal vision, it can no longer claim objectivity. Yet another
event has challenged the authority of vision: the so-called "linguistic turn," the idea that cognition is
discursive. Accordingly, man's relation to the world is not primarily visual but mediated by language.
Caught in the "prison-house of language," the subject is likewise conditioned by language. We will
search for the blind spots of vision and ask whether, perhaps, "the deep truth is imageless," as Shelley
and others maintained. On the other hand, we will also have to determine whether truth is linguistic in
nature or whether we are searching with linguistic means for something that in fact exists beyond
language. The answers to these questions will help us to explore differing views on how the subject is
constituted.