** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
Philadelphia DAO New Policies**
Effective Date: 2/15/2018
These policies are an effort to end mass incarceration and bring balance back to sentencing. All
policies are presumptive, not mandatory requirements. Where extraordinary circumstances
suggest that an exception is appropriate, specific supervisory approval must be obtained.
Wherever the term “supervisory approval” is used, it means that:
(1) An Assistant District Attorney must obtain approval of the unit’s supervisor, and
(2) The supervisor must then obtain approval from the District Attorney, or in his absence,
the approval of First Assistant Carolyn Temin or Robert Listenbee
(3) Bona fide verbal approvals and disapprovals are sufficient and must be noted in the
case file, including the date of approval and identity of the requesting Assistant District
Attorney and the supervisor who obtained approval or disapproval from the District
Attorney.
DECLINE CERTAIN CHARGES
1. Do not charge possession of marijuana (cannabis) regardless of weight.
2. Do not charge any of the offenses relating to paraphernalia or buying from a person
(BFP) where the drug involved is marijuana.
3. Do not charge prostitution cases against sex workers.
4. Do not charge or prosecute cases involving the possession of Buprenorphine.
CHARGE LOWER GRADATIONS FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES
Rationale: summary gradation greatly reduces pre-trial incarceration rates as no bail
is required and the shorter time required for hearings expedites Municipal Court and
Common Pleas dockets.
** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
1. Charge and dispose of Retail Theft cases as summary offenses unless the value of the
item(s) stolen in a particular case exceeds $500.00 or where the defendant has a very
long history of theft and retail theft convictions.
2. You must seek supervisory approval to charge and dispose of retail theft cases at
misdemeanor or felony levels.
3. Remember, that a summary conviction permits a sentence of 90 days incarceration,
fines of up to $250, and full restitution. These penalties are sufficient to hold a retail thief
accountable.
4. In all cases, seek full restitution.
DIVERT MORE
All attorneys are directed to approach diversion and re-entry with greater flexibility and an eye
toward achieving accountability and justice while avoiding convictions where appropriate. For
example:
1. An otherwise law-abiding, responsible gun owner who is arrested because he does not
have a permit to carry a firearm may apply for individualized consideration for diversion.
2. An otherwise law-abiding, first DUI (driving under the influence) defendant who has no
driver's license (regardless of whether or not that defendant's immigration status
interferes with obtaining a license under Pa. law) may apply for individualized
consideration for diversion with a requirement of efforts to overcome license
impediments where possible as an aspect of any diversionary program.
3. A defendant charged with marijuana (cannabis) delivery or PWID (Possession with the
Intent to Deliver) may apply for diversion.
This is not a comprehensive list.
INCREASE PARTICIPATION IN RE-ENTRY PROGRAMS
In general, some effective re-entry programs have failed to attract more candidates due to
rewards and incentives of the program that are minor compared with the major effort required of
re-entering Philadelphians. Effective re-entry programs prevent crime and should apply to more
re-entering Philadelphians. ADAs and staff involved in re-entry are directed to discuss and
formulate suggestions to improve this situation by May 1, 2018.
** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
PLEA OFFERS
Note: This policy does not apply to Homicides, Violent Crimes, Sexual Assault
Crimes, Felon in Possession of a Weapon (6105), and Economic Crimes with a loss of
$50,000 dollars or more or cases involving attacks on the integrity of the judicial process
(e.g. false reports to police, perjury, obstruction of the administration of justice, witness
intimidation, etc. All of these cases require supervisor approval as stated above.
1. Make plea offers below the bottom end of the mitigated range of the PA Sentencing
Guidelines for most crimes.
2. Where an Individual ADA believes an offer below the bottom end of the mitigated range
is too low due to specific factors, that ADA must seek supervisory approval of a higher
offer.
3. Where the applicable sentencing guidelines range is between 0 and 24 months, ADAs
should seek more house arrest, probationary, and alternative sentences in appropriate
cases.
AT SENTENCING, STATE ON THE RECORD THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE
SENTENCE YOU ARE RECOMMENDING
The United States has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. It has increased
500% over a few decades. Pennsylvania and Philadelphia have been incarcerating at an even
higher rate than comparable U.S. states and cities for decades--a 700% increase over the same
few decades in Pennsylvania; and Philadelphia in recent years has been the most incarcerated
of the 10 largest cities. Yet Pennsylvania and Philadelphia are not safer as a result, due to
wasting resources in corrections rather than investing in other measures that reduce crime.
Pennsylvania's and Philadelphia's over-incarceration have bankrupted investment in policing,
public education, medical treatment of addiction, job training and economic development---
which prevent crime more effectively than money invested in corrections. Over-incarceration
also tears the fabric of defendants' familial and work relationships that tend to rehabilitate
defendants who are open to rehabilitation and thereby prevent crime. As a result, a return to
lower rates of incarceration for those defendants who do not require lengthy sentences is
necessary in order to shift resources to crime prevention. Ultimately, the highest goal of
sentencing must be to seek justice for society as a whole (the Commonwealth includes victims,
witnesses, defendants, and those not directly involved in an individual case) while effectively
preventing crimes in the future via methods that work. Each case, each defendant, and each
sentence is unique and requires your careful consideration.
At sentencing, ADAs must state on the record their reasoning for requesting a particular
sentence, and must state the unique benefits and costs of the sentence (e.g. consider where
applicable the safety benefits, impact on victims, interruption of defendants' connections to
family, employment, needed public benefits, and the actual financial cost of incarceration). In
** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
each case, place the financial cost of incarceration on the record as part of your explanation of
the sentence recommended.
In talking about the financial cost to the taxpayer, use the following, arguably low, but
much-repeated cost of:
$42,000.00 per year to incarcerate one person ($3,500 per month or $115.00 per day).
The actual cost (including pension and other benefits to correctional employees, health
care for incarcerated individuals, etc.) arguably is close to $60,000.00 per year to incarcerate
one person in the Philadelphia County prison system.
FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW AND CONSIDER IN MAKING YOUR
RECOMMENDATION
1. The actual cost (including pension and other benefits to correctional employees,
health care for incarcerated individuals, etc.) arguably is close to $60,000 now to
incarcerate one person for a year in Philadelphia County prison system. ($5,000 per
month at $164.00 per day).
2. As of March 1, 2022, Philadelphia County incarcerates approximately 4,600 people
at any given time with a total annual cost of around $360 Million per year.
3. The cost of one year of unnecessary incarceration (at $42,000.00 - $60,000.00) is in
the range of the cost of one year's salary for a beginning teacher, police officer, fire
fighter, social worker, Assistant District Attorney, or addiction counselor. You may
use these comparisons on the record.
4. The average family's total income in Philadelphia in 2022 is approximately
$46,000.00---which paid their housing, food, utilities, transportation, clothing,
educational expense and taxes.
EXAMPLES OF HOW THIS INFORMATION CAN BE USED AT SENTENCING
1. If you are seeking a sentence of 3 years incarceration, state on the record that the cost
to the taxpayer will be $126,000.00 (3 x $42,000.00) if not more and explain why you
believe that cost is justified.
2. In a very serious matter, where for example, 25 years incarceration are sought and is
appropriate, state on the record that the cost to the taxpayer is $1,050,000.00 (25 x
$42,000.00) if not more and explain why you believe that cost is justified.
3. When recommending a sentence of probation, compare the cost of incarceration to the
cost of probation.
** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
Emphasize the positive rehabilitative factors of a probationary sentence such as
permitting the defendant to continue working and paying taxes, permitting the
continuation of family life, education and community inclusion.
REQUEST SHORTER PROBATION TAILS (I.E. CONSECUTIVE PERIOD OF
PROBATION) OR NO PROBATION TAIL AFTER A SENTENCE OF
INCARCERATION.
Criminological studies show that most violations of probation occur within the first 12
months. Assuming that a defendant is violation free for 12 months, any remaining probation is
simply excess baggage requiring unnecessary expenditure of funds for supervision. Working
with our justice partners and through the policies of this office, we have reduced the number of
people on supervision in Philadelphia from 42000 in 2018 to fewer than 26000 in 2022. There is
no reason to assume a probationary tail must be two years or more in every single case.
Carefully evaluate what, if any, probationary tail is appropriate upon completion of a sentence of
incarceration. For more information, please see the office policy on probation tails, which limits
the length of probation for felonies to 3 years and misdemeanors to 1 year.
REQUEST SHORTER PROBATIONARY SENTENCES WHERE NO SENTENCE OF
INCARCERATION IS SOUGHT.
Criminological studies confirm that longer probationary periods often result in more
failures than shorter ones where those studies have controlled for offense and criminal record.
REQUEST NO MORE THAN A 6-MONTH VOP SENTENCE FOR A TECHNICAL
VIOLATION WITHOUT SUPERVISORY APPROVAL
In many technical violation cases, no additional incarceration should be sought and no
revocation is necessary. However, where the technical violation(s) calls for a more serious
consequence, do not seek more than 30 to 60 days of incarceration unless you have approval
from the District Attorney via your supervisor. For most technical violations, you should not
recommend a custodial sentence.
SUPERVISORY REQUEST NO MORE THAN A 1-2 YEAR VOP SENTENCE FOR A
DIRECT VIOLATION WITHOUT APPROVAL
Every direct violation presents the opportunity for two sentencings (one on the old matter
and one on the new matter) that take into account the fact of the defendant's commission of a
new crime while under supervision. Obviously, commission of a new crime while under
supervision is a factor tending to increase the sentence on the new matter. Therefore, ordinarily
it is not necessary to seek a sentence of longer than 1-2 years for a direct VOP. However,
** These policies, which relate to various subjects, are included here together because they are the very first policies announced by District
Attorney Larry Krasner within forty-five days after assuming office. They were a historic first step in the re-shaping of the Philadelphia Criminal
Justice System.
where special factors arise, you may seek approval from the District Attorney via your
supervisor to seek a lengthier direct VOP sentence.
REQUEST THAT THERE BE NO VIOLATION OF PROBATION OR PAROLE DUE TO
A POSITIVE DRUG TEST FOR USE OF MARIJUANA (CANNABIS) OR DUE TO
POSSESSION OF CANNABIS WITHOUT SUPERVISORY APPROVAL