SYSC 22 : Regulatory references Section 22.5 : Giving references: additional
rules and guidance for all firms
22
■ Release 39 ● Aug 2024www.handbook.fca.org.ukSYSC 22/14
Factors to take into account Comments
(A) Whether P has committed a ser- Individual conduct requirements has
ious breach of individual conduct re- the same meaning as in Part Two of
quirements. SYSC 22 Annex 1R (Template for regu-
latory references given by SMCR
firms and disclosure requirements).
Factors to take into account in decid-
ing whether the breach is serious in-
clude the following.
(1) The extent to which the conduct
was deliberate or reckless.
(2)The extent to which the conduct
was dishonest.
(3)Whether the breaches are fre-
quent or whether they have con-
tinued over a long period of time.
The fact that breaches were fre-
quent or repeated may increase the
likelihood that they should be dis-
closed since the breaches may show
a pattern of non-compliance.
(4)The extent of loss, or risk of loss,
caused to existing, past or potential
investors, depositors, policyholders
or other counterparties or
customers.
(5)The reasons for the breach. For
example, where the breach was
caused by lack of experience which
has been remedied by training or
further experience, it is less likely
that the breach will still be relevant.
(B) Whether the conduct caused B (1) The factors in (A) are relevant to
to breach requirements of the regu- whether P’s conduct was serious.
latory system or P was concerned in
(2)The seriousness of the breach by
a contravention of such a require-
B is relevant. The factors in (A) are
ment by B and, in each case,
also relevant to this.
whether P’s conduct was itself
serious.
(3)A breach by B of certain require-
ments is always likely to be serious
under (2). Breach of the threshold
conditions is an example. However
that does not mean that P’s involve-
ment will automatically be serious.
(C) Whether P’s conduct involved dis- Dishonesty is an important factor
honesty (whether or not also invol- but it is not automatically decisive
ving a criminal act). in every case. For instance, a small
one-off case of dishonesty many ye-
ars ago may not be sufficiently ser-
ious to require disclosure.
(D) Whether the conduct would
have resulted in B’s dismissing P,
had P still been working for B,
based on B's disciplinary policies
and the requirements of the law
about unfair dismissal.