Case report: Escitalopram-
associated lower limb edema
Mohamed Hassan Ahmed
1
*
, Mena Al-Kubaisi
2
,
Safa Abdulmajeed
Al-Rawi
2
, Omar Hosam Salama
2
and Hebah Mahmoud Abutayyem
3
1
Consultant Psychiatrist, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Ajman, United Arab Emirates,
2
Bachelor of
Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS), Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates,
3
Pharmacy
Department, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
Escitalopram is widely prescribed for the treatment of major depressive disorder
and generalized anxiety disorder with a well-documented side effects prole.
Peripheral edema, however, is a rarely reported adverse reaction that warrants
further work up. This paper summarizes the case of a 58-year female patient who
developed transient bilateral peripheral edema following the administration of
low dose escitalopram. This case underscores the necessity for clinicians to be
familiar with even rare potential side effects of commonly prescribed
medications. It also suggests a need for patient education regarding the
importance of reporting new symptoms promptly.
KEYWORDS
edema, drug-associated, side effects, SSRIs, escitalopram
1 Introduction
Escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), is commonly utilized in the
treatment of major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder due to its efcacy and
relatively favorable side effect prole (1). Despite its widespread use, certain adverse drug
reactions (ADRs) remain less characterized in the medical literature. Peripheral edema is
infrequently associated with SSRI (1). Peripheral edema typically presents as a swelling in the
lower extremities. It has been associated with a myriad of etiologies, including cardiac, renal,
hepatic, or venous insufciency, as well as several pharmacological agents (2). The incidence
of drug-associated peripheral edema is often underreported and may lead to non-compliance
or unnecessary medical investigations if not promptly recognized (2). We report a case of a
58-year-old-year-old female patient who developed transient bilateral peripheral edema
following the administration of escitalopram. The case presents a unique instance of an
adverse drug reaction (ADR) to a widely used medication, distinguished by the absence of
other typical causes of edema. This is conrmed through extensive diagnostic tests.
Importantly, the connection between the medication and edema is underscored by the
precise timing of the reaction and the swift resolution after stopping the medication, which
Frontiers in Psychiatry frontiersin.org01
OPEN ACCESS
EDITED BY
Mirko Manchia,
University of Cagliari, Italy
REVIEWED BY
Yassir Mahgoub,
The Pennsylvania State University,
United States
Takahiko Nagamine,
Sunlight Brain Research Center, Japan
*CORRESPONDENCE
Mohamed Hassan Ahmed
RECEIVED 02 March 2024
ACCEPTED 15 April 2024
PUBLISHED 26 April 2024
CITATION
Ahmed MH, Al-Kubaisi M, Al-Rawi SA,
Salama OH and Abutayyem HM (2024)
Case report: Escitalopram-associated
lower limb edema.
Front. Psychiatry 15:1394813.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394813
COPYRIGHT
© 2024 Ahmed, Al-Kubaisi, Al-Rawi, Salama
and Abutayyem. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The
use, distribution or reproduction in other
forums is permitted, provided the original
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are
credited and that the original publication in
this journal is cited, in accordance with
accepted academic practice. No use,
distribution or reproduction is permitted
which does not comply with these terms.
TYPE Case Report
PUBLISHED 26 April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394813
substantiates a direct relationship between the two. Through this
report, we aim to highlight the clinical approach to diagnosing and
managing such an atypical presentation and discussing the broader
implications on management with psychotropic medications (3).
2 Case presentation
A 58-year-old female, previously healthy with unremarkable
medical and family history, presented with disturbed sleep. She
gradually developed insomnia and appetite loss over one month,
prior to her visit, and she also suffered from low mood. A full medical
assessment was done in a private hospital which indicated no
underline medical explanation for her symptoms. A plan was
made, and she was provided with psychoeducation and a
therapeutic regimen of escitalopram, initiated at a dose of 5 mg/
day, for 30 days, to manage her depressive episode. Later, she
presented to our outpatient department for follow up with an acute
onset of bilateral lower limb swelling. This event occurred after 6 days
from the commencement of the therapeutic regimen. Notably, the
patient had not reported any recent alterations in her medication
regimen or any signicant medical history that could contribute to
the current symptomatology. Upon examination, the patient
exhibited bilateral peripheral edema, characterized by swelling
extending from the dorsum of the feet to the mid-calves. The
edema was pitting, without accompanying erythema, ulceration, or
discoloration of the overlying skin, which may have suggested an
inammatory or infectious etiology. Her cardiovascular assessment
did not reveal any signs suggestive of congestive heart failure, and her
abdominal examination was unremarkable, discounting hepatic or
renal pathology as a primary cause.
3 Diagnostic assessment
Laboratory investigations were promptly conducted, which
inclu ded a complete blood count, renal function panel, which
included electrolytes such as calcium, sodium, potassium and
chloride, liver function panel, thyroid function tests, and a
comprehensive urinalysis. The results of these tests were largely
within normal parameters, excluding the common systemic causes
of edema. However, the urinalysis yielded atypical nding s
including pyuria, hematuria, ketonuria, and hemoglobinuria,
indicating a possible acute urinary pathology. Additionally, the
patients glycemic control was brought into question by an elevated
HbA1c level, and liver enzyme disturbances were evidenced by
increased total and indirect bilirubin, AST, and GGT levels. Serum
lipid prole, C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide
(BNP), and troponin T results were within normal ranges, ruling
out cardiovascular causes. With the exclusion of more common
etiologies and the temporal association between the initiation of
escitalopram and the development of edema, a provisional
diagnosis of drug-associated periphe ral edema was considered.
Escitalopram was subsequently discontinued and resulted in a
rapid and complete resolution of edema within three days, further
substantiating the causative relationship.
Patient perspective
Initially, the patient was concerned about the leg edema she
started to develop, not sure the reason behind it. Following the
identication and ce ssation of the causative medicine and the
initiation of an alternate medication, the patient was happy that
her leg edema was resolved quickly and still willing to adhere to her
new medication. She was aware of the signicance of reporting any
worries and not ignoring any signs.
4 Discussion
Drug-associated edema refers to the abnormal accumulation of
uid in the interstitial spaces of the body as a result of medication.
Although the edema can be frequent with some drugs, it remains
inadequately understood and underdiagnosed. This poor
characterization concerns both their mechanism and action. And
the reporting system for peripheral edema varies from study to
study. Medications from different classes have been implicated in
causing edema, commonly with anticancer, antihypertensives,
corticosteroids, psychotropics, and many more (4). In psychiatry,
considering psychotropic drugs and their association with
peripheral edema, antipsychotics and antidepressants are mostly
reported. The medications with the highest rate of association were
mirtazapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and pregabalin (5).
Four main mechanisms account for the etiology of drug-associated
edema: sodium and water retention (re nal edema) , increa sed
capillary permeability (permeability edema), lymphatic
insuf ciency (lymphedema), and precapillary arteriolar
vasodilation (vasodilatory edema) (4).
The estimated incidence of peripheral edema can vary widely
depending on the population studied and the medications involved.
For example, peripheral edema is a common side effect of calcium
channel blockers (CCBs), with an incidence ranging from 2% to
25% depending on the type of CCB, dosage, and durati on of
therapy. Amlodipine, in particular, is more likely to lead to
peripheral edema compared to n ondihydropyridine CCBs and
newer lipophilic DHP CCBs (6). Gabapentin is another
medication that can cause peripheral edema, reported at an
incidence rate of 2% to 8%. The occurrence of edema seems to be
dose-related and more common in the elderly population. In a
pooled analysis from clinical trials, the incidence increased from
1.4% to 7.5% with doses of 1800 mg/day and up to 12.3% at 3600
mg/day. However, there are cases of edema developing at doses
lower than 1800 mg/day, indicating that it might not always be
dose-related (7 ). Its also important to note that while CCB-
associated edema is a frequent issue leading to the use of
diuretics, this type of edema is not caused by uid overload, and
using diuretics can pose risks, especially in older adults (6). As for
the general prevalence of peripheral edema, one source suggested
that approximately 20% of adults older than 50 years may
experience edema (8).
In antidepressants, nearly all major classes were found to be
associated with edema in a systematic review comparing them. Of
these medications, trazodone is the most implicated, followed by
Ahmed et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394813
Frontiers in Psychiatry frontiersin.org02
mirtazapine in second place and escitalopram in third. Particularly,
SSRIs contributed 24.4% compared to the other classes (9). No clear
conclusion is made regarding the possible etilology of anti-
depressant associated edema, as most studies are case reports, but
the proposed etiology involves the antagonism of a1 adrenergic
receptors and 5HT2A receptors, leading to vascular smooth muscle
relaxation, increased capillary vasodilatation, hydrostatic pressure,
and subsequent edema (5)(9). Another possible mechanism
suggests that 5-HT1B receptors are in endothelial cells, and
stimulation of this receptor by increased serotonin induces
vasodilation through the production of nitric oxide (NO) (10).
Bilateral leg edema was reported in some cases with the use of
escitalopram. Most of the patients were diagnosed with major
depressive disorder and started on escitalopram in different doses,
with a minimum dose ranging from 10 mg to 30 mg/day as the
highest dose reported (11). In our case, the patient was started on 5
mg/day of escitalopram. The duration of the time from starting the
medication to reporting the edema ranged between one week to
three weeks (12). In our case, similarly, edema was reported 6
days later.
Reviewing the medication history is crucial when the cause of
bilateral lower limb edema is unknown. If any medications are
suspected to be associated with the edema, they must be stopped,
or their dosage reduced. In addition, the basic laboratory work up
should focus initially on excluding major systemic diseases, which
include heart failure, renal disease, liver disease and DVT. Other
possible differential diagnosis include hypothyroidism, lymphedema
due to lymphatic obstruction after trauma or surgery, angioedema
and urticaria secondary to allergic reaction. Systemic evaluation
includes complete blood count, urinalysis, electrolytes, creatinine,
blood sugar, thyroid stimulation hormone, albumin, and other tests
for specic indication. Table 1 shows the suggested additional
workup for the common differential diagnosis (13).
In our case, blood tests that include kidn ey function, live r
function, urine analysis, complete blood count, thyroid function
test, cardiac tests, and electrolytes showed no signicant results or
indication of underlying disease. Risk assessment for thrombosis
was done which resulted in a very low risk for thrombotic disease.
However, thrombotic assessment such duplex ultrasound and D-
dimer to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were not done.
Drugs interaction or adverse drug reaction are ruled out because the
patient only takes lorazepam before bed (14). Medication associated
edem a was s uspected, and escitalopram was discontinued, the
edema resolved after 3 days. Despite escitalopram being a
commonly prescribed medication for mood disorders, this case
report highlights a rare side effect of the drug, edema. Whic h
emphasizes the need for additional research on the side effects of
SSRIs and draws attention to the signicance of attentive patient
monitoring, educating patients about the potential for edema
development even at low therapeutic d oses, and promptly
reporting any such occurrences.
5 Conclusion
Escitalopram associated bilateral leg edema is a side effect that
should be considered when prescribing despite its rarity. Edema can
occur at low therapeutic doses and in the absence of other possible
medical etiologies. This indicates the further need for healthcare
professionals to maintain a broad differential diagnosis when
encountering peripheral edema, considering drug associated causes in
the context of recent medication changes. This shows the importance of
close therapeutic monitoring, blood tests, and knowledge of underlying
medical issues, drug interactions, and potential adverse effects.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included
in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be
directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s)
for the publication of any potentially identiable images or data
included in this article.
Author contributions
MHA: Writing review & editing, Supervision. MA: Writing
review & editing, Writing original draft, Project administration.
SA: Writing original draft, Writing review & editing. OS:
Writing original draft, Writing review & editing. HM:
Writing review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no nancial support was received for
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
absence of any commercial or nancial relationships that could be
construed as a potential conict of interest.
TABLE 1 Differential diagnosis and suggested work-up for medication-
associated lower limb edema.
Differential
Diagnosis
Diagnostic studies
Heart failure ECG, Echocardiogram, chest radiograph, brain
natriuretic peptide
Liver disease ALT, AST, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase,
prothrombin time, serum albumin
Kidney disease Urinalysis with exam of sediment, serum lipids
DVT D-dimer, doppler exam
Lymphedema Abdominal/pelvic CT scan
Ahmed et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394813
Frontiers in Psychiatry frontiersin.org03
Publishers note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the
authors and do not necessarily represent those of their afliated
organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the
reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or
claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or
endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Landy K, Rosani A, Estevez R. Escitalopram. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing,
Treasure Island (FL (2024). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/
NBK557734/.
2. Goyal A, Cusick AS, Bhutta BS. Peripheral Edema. In: StatPearls. StatPearls
Publishing, Treasure Island (FL (2024). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
books/NBK554452/.
3. Glod CA. Psychopharmacology and clinical practice. Nurs Clinics North America.
(1991) 26:37599. doi: 10.1016/S0029-6465(22)00253-5
4. Largeau B, Cracowski J-L, Lengelle
́
C, Sautenet B, Jonville-Be
́
ra A-P. Drug-
induced peripheral oedema: An aetiology-based review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2021)
87:304355. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14752
5. Engel J, Haack B, Zolk O, Greiner T, Heinze M, Toto S, et al. Edema related to
treatment with psychotropic drugs. J Neural Transm. (2024) 131:25366. doi: 10.1007/
s00702-024-02738-6
6. Savage RD, Visentin JD, Bronskill SE, Wang X, Gruneir A, Giannakeas V, et al.
Evaluation of a common prescribing cascade of calcium channel blockers and diuretics
in older a dults with hypertension. JAMA Intern Med. (2020) 18 0(5) :64351.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7087
7. Finegan A, Mabrouk U, Nelson LA. Gabapentin-induced bilateral lower extremity
edema in a patient with pervasive developmental disorder and schizoaffective disorder.
Ment Health Clinician. (2020) 10:2503. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2020.07.250
8. Besharat S, Grol-Prokopczyk H, Gao S, Feng C, Akwaa F, Gewandter JS.
Peripheral edema: A common and persistent health problem for older Americans.
PloS One. (2021) 16(12):e0260742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260742
9. Joseph JT, Vishwanath R, Prahara j S. Peripheral edema associated with
antidepressant use: Systematic review of case reports. Hum Psychopharmacol. (2023)
38:e2884. doi: 10.1002/hup.2884
10. Gamoh S, Hisa H, Yamamoto R. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors as targets for
drug 204 therapies of vascular-related diseases. Biol Pharm Bull. (2013) 36:14105.
doi: 10.1248/bpb.b13-00317
11. Tuman TC, Tuman B. A rare side effect of escitalopram: Bilateral peripheral
edema (2018). Available online at: https://www.scielo.br/j/rpc/a/
vPXjbmB7sn5cGYPYMTSYPyt/?lang=en.
12. Kontoangelos K, Oulis P, Economou M, Komporozos A, Papadimitriou GN. P
213 1091 - Administration of escitalopram and bilateral ankle oedema: case report. Eur
Psychiatry. (2012) 214 27:1. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(12)75258-6
13. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH. Approach to leg edema of 216
unclear etiology. J Am Board Family Medicine: JABFM. (2006) 19:14860. doi: 10.3122/
jabfm.19.2.148
14. Baykan H, Yargıç LI
̇
. Escitalopram induced peripheral edema (2021). Available
online at: https://psychiatry-psychopharmacology.com/en/escitalopram-induced-
peripheral-edema-a-case221report-133062.
Ahmed et al. 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394813
Frontiers in Psychiatry frontiersin.org04