The Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) is a nonprofit public service
organization. It is closely associated with and funded through the
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which is wholly supported by
auto insurers. HLDI gathers, processes, and publishes data on the
ways in which insurance losses vary among different kinds of vehicles.
1005 N. Glebe Rd. Arlington, VA 22201 703/247-1600 Fax 703/247-1595 www.highwaysafety.org
Collisions that result in serious and fatal occupant injuries are rela-
tively rare, so they have only a small influence on the insurance injury
results reported in this table. (The results in this publication are dom-
inated by the relatively frequent low to moderate severity collisions
and associated injuries.) A separate report, published periodically by
the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, is based on fatal crashes.
It summarizes driver deaths per million registered vehicle years by
make and model.
Vehicles with high death rates often have high frequencies of insur-
ance claims for occupant injuries.For example, small two- and four-
door cars typically have high death rates and higher-than-average
insurance injury claims experience. But there are exceptions. Sports
cars tend to have high death rates because they’re more likely to be
in high-speed single-vehicle crashes in which the risk of fatality is
high. However, insurance injury claim frequencies for sports cars tend
to be about average.
GUIDE TO THIS REPORT
GUIDE TO THIS REPORT
COMPARISON WITH DEATH RATES
COMPARISON WITH DEATH RATES
The table inside summarizes the recent insurance injury, collision, and
theft losses of passenger cars, pickups, and utility vehicles. Results are
based on the loss experience of 1998-2000 models from their first
sales through May 2001.For vehicles newly introduced or redesigned
during these years, the results are based on the most recent model
years for which the vehicle designs were unchanged — either 1999-
2000 or 2000 only. Results are grouped according to vehicle body style
and then vehicle size. A total of 278 passenger vehicles are listed.
The results in this publication are generally good predictors of the
experience of current versions of the same vehicle models. However,
manufacturers substantially redesign their passenger vehicles period-
ically, and, in these cases, the experience of earlier models with the
same name may not predict the experience of the newer designs.
Collision and theft losses are presented in terms of average loss pay-
ments per insured vehicle year (see definitions). Injury losses repre-
sent claim frequencies filed under Personal Injury Protection (PIP)
coverages. All losses are stated in relative terms, with 100 represent-
ing the average injury, collision, or theft loss for all cars (a result of 122
is 22 percent worse than average, 96 is 4 percent better than average,
etc.) Vehicles are listed within each group in ascending sequence of
injury claim frequency results. For convenience, results are color-
coded to indicate which are better and worse than average. Results
also are adjusted, or standardized, to reduce possible distortions from
two nonvehicle factors — operator age (injury, collision, and theft
results) and insurance deductible (collision and theft results only).
Insurance losses vary widely among individual vehicle models.Vehicle
size is strongly related to both injury and collision losses, but these
losses also vary among vehicles in the same body style/size groups.
Collision coverage: insurance that provides reimbursement for the
cost of repairing crash damage to insured vehicles
Deductible amount: policyholder’s portion of the loss
Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage: no-fault insurance that pro-
vides reimbursement for medical/hospital/other expenses, up to spec-
ified limits, for crash injuries occurring in insured vehicles, regardless
of fault
Relative average loss payment per insured vehicle year: dollar total of
collision or theft loss payments for claims for a group of vehicles divid-
ed by exposure (aggregate years the vehicles have been insured) for
the group; result is expressed in relative terms compared with all cars
Relative claim frequency:number of injury claims for a group of vehi-
cles divided by exposure (aggregate years the vehicles have been
insured) for the group; result is expressed in relative terms compared
with all cars
INJURY, COLLISION,
& THEFT LOSSES
INJURY, COLLISION,
& THEFT LOSSES
By make and model, 1998-2000 models September 2001